SolarWorld announces International Trade Commission ruling: Chinese imports are harming US solar manufacturing industry

HILLSBORO, USA: SolarWorld Industries America Inc. commended a key, unanimous US trade determination issued that Chinese imports of solar cells and panels into the United States have harmed American domestic solar manufacturers. The company said the resounding ruling confirms the position of a manufacturing coalition it leads that China’s systematic and state-sponsored unfair trade practices are anticompetitive.

The US International Trade Commission ruling advances its investigation, along with a parallel US Department of Commerce investigation, into whether the government should apply remedies to prevent further harm. The investigations began in response to petitions by SolarWorld Industries America Inc., the largest US solar manufacturer, and the Coalition for American Solar Manufacturing (CASM), which represents more than 150 employers of more 11,000 workers. So far, CASM contends, China’s export drive has cost Americans about 2,000 direct jobs throughout the United States and many more at the subcontractor level.

“SolarWorld and countless other participants in the US solar industry stand for sustainable production in the major markets where solar is sold, for healthy, international and sustainable competition, and for sustainable environmental practices in producing and deploying renewable energy,” said Gordon Brinser, president of SolarWorld Industries America Inc. and leader of CASM. “Conversely, nothing about China’s export campaign has proven to be sustainable, including its subsidized and dumped pricing.

“Today’s unanimous vote is another step toward restoring the healthy global competition in the solar industry that has reliably driven down production costs and prices by 10 percent or so a year for many years,” Brinser said. “We only ask for fair and legal competition, which is good for industry and consumers alike.”

In a letter to President Obama issued, about 60 members of the US Senate and House of Representatives concurred, raising concerns that China’s anticompetitive trade practices undermine innovation, jobs and efficiency. Obama has expressed similar concerns in response to questions about the case last month.

As soon as Jan. 12, the U.S. Department of Commerce could determine preliminary trade remedies as well as “critical circumstances,” meaning that China had mounted a surge of US imports to circumvent the imposition of tariffs. If Commerce does both, importers would have to put up bonds or cash deposits on estimated duties on imports back to Oct. 14, 2011. On Nov. 9, the Commerce Department initiated its investigations and found that the domestic industry supported the petitions.